Getting Started
Your boss has just walked in the door and said, “we need an interpretive plan and you’re going to write it.” Because you’re a good employee, you nod and smile and agree to get it done as efficiently as possible. But you’ve never done it before – maybe you know something about interpretation and maybe you don’t, but you’ve never had to actually write an interpretive plan. Where do you start?
Even experienced planners find themselves asking this question with every project. And the logical starting point is not always the same (remember principle #4 – Every process will be different, because every project is unique). But there are some simple questions you can ask to get the ball rolling.
First, ask if you can have help. Is there any money to hire this done or do you have coworkers who can serve on a planning team? If you can hire it done, it doesn’t mean you can abandon the project once your contractor is hired – you’re still going to need to know how to do this so that you can work with your contractor to get what you want and need. If you can put together a coworker planning team, be sure to assign someone (maybe you) as the project leader to make sure that the project continues to move forward. If you have time, consider taking an interpretive planning class or reading a book to get some familiarity with process and products.
Next, determine the scope of the project and what purpose you want the plan to serve. Is it long-range, short-term, for a single location or multiple units? What is the planning “bubble” that your work will encompass? Perhaps the most important question to ask is what are you really trying to accomplish? Once you know that, then you can begin to look at background material that might be relevant to the challenge you’re trying to resolve.
Certainly, reviewing (or creating) the mission of the organization is critical at this stage because it can help you determine whether the project you’re attempting is even appropriate to the agency. Some plans get, or should get, stopped in their tracks at this point because a quick review of organizational mission and goals reveals that the project isn’t a good fit and shouldn’t be pursued.
Next, you might want to create the impact and outcome levels of your logic model (see previous blogs on logic models). These will help inform what you’re going to do next and what background resources you will need to create the most effective plan.
From there, you’re going to have to start making choices about what to do next. Certainly, gathering information about your resources (not just the natural or cultural artifacts and features, but also operational resources like staffing, facilities, and budget), and your audiences is critical. The analysis of the information you gather and matching that analysis against your objectives will begin to reveal what options you might want to pursue next.
Simply put, the interpretive planning process can be fairly simple and straightforward or it can be extremely complex, depending on the individual project situation. But you have to start somewhere. Pick your starting place and get going – it’s the only way it’s going to get done.








July 23rd, 2010 at 8:41 am
Hi Lisa
Hope all is well with you and your projects.
I tried sending you an email via the contact us option but it was not working so I’s using your blog to ask a question.
I would like to know your thoughts about the life span of an exhibition. Thins change so rapidly nowadays, what would be the average lifespan for an exhibition? Do you know of any study about this topic?
Do you know of any good example of an exhibition design or strategy that gives the flexibility of changing the exhibition on a regular basis?
Thank you for your help.
I included André’s email for your answer since I will be off on vacations until the end of August. However here is my email diane.schreiner@pc.gc.ca
July 28th, 2010 at 12:26 pm
Hi Diane and Andre, Thanks for your question. Of course, the answer is that it depends on the purpose of the exhibition, and other considerations such as the percentage of repeat visitors that are expected in a given amount of time. Most places that have high repeat visitation make a practice of changing exhibitions annually or on three-year cycles (Monterey Bay Aquarium or Oregon Coast Aquarium would be good examples of this). It may also depend on budget and whether your location has its own exhibit design/fabrication shop or whether you have to contract out the work. Some of the flexibility factors you can build into exhibit galleries (particularly in museums) that may help with changing exhibitions regularly without having to change infrastructure would be larger rooms with moveable interior walls, electrical and fiberoptic cable work in floor and/or ceiling grids (rather than on perimeter walls) for maximum flexibility in placing future exhibits that may require electronic components, track lighting with flexible spotlighting capabilities, etc. I do not know of specific studies about rotation of exhibits that might be helpful, but would recommend that you contact the aquariums mentioned or other facilities that regularly change exhibitions to learn about their particular challenges with doing so.
Lisa